Saturday, 9 May 2015

Film Review: Das Boot - Wolfgang Peterson, Jürgen Prochnow, et al.



In Das Boot Director Wolfgang Peterson tells the story of the German submarine U-96 and her crew, as they go out on patrol in the Atlantic. The story is based upon the 1973 book of the same name by war correspondent Lothar-Günther Buchheim, who accompanied the real U-96 on her seventh patrol, under Fregattenkapitän Heinrich Lehmann-Willenbrock, one of the Kriegsmarine's WWII 'tonnage aces'.
Lehmann-Willenbrock (left) and
Buchheim (right), on board U-96, 1941.


The 1973 book cover.

This epic production was intended for release as both a film and a TV mini-series. As numerous fans and reviewers of this WWII epic have noted this can potentially present problems in deciding which version to get. My intuition, helped by some reading of online reviews, Wikipedia and other resources, etc, steered me towards seeking out the longest release I could lay my hands on. Consequently I bought the 282 minute, 2004 '2 disc uncut version'. 

That's four hours forty-two minutes long! Apparently Peterson's original plan for the German TV series was to be six hours. I'm not aware of any versions quite that long. If there was such a version, I'd want it. The shortfall is just shy of an hour and twenty minutes. Can that all have been ad breaks? One hopes not! From what I've read here and elsewhere this trumps both the theatrical and 'director's cut' versions, both in terms of length and viewing experience.





One of Kriegsberichter Buchheim's photos, on board U-96.

Buchheim amidst the crew.

At the time of posting this review it's my fourth or fifth viewing of the film - this time watched in one sitting - and it remains utterly magnificent: compelling, moving, entertaining, thought-provoking. The hours flew by. Simply put, it's brilliant!



Traditionally media production executives seem to have erred on the side of brevity. Perhaps this is changing? thanks to things like the Peter Jackon LOTR and Hobbit trilogies, which categorically prove that large audiences will sit through marathon movies. Certainly part of what makes this lengthiest version so good - perhaps even part of its charm? [1] - are the long periods, weighted toward the beginning of the film, in which there's little or no action. [2] I haven't seen the theatrical release version of Das Boot, so I can't really pass judgement on it. All I can say is that, for me, the dramatic arc, or the tension and release, could only have worked as it did in the longer form.



A poster for the shorter theatrical release.


I'd actually quite like to see the short 'action-movie' version, to see how it compares. It may well work very nicely in that form. But I have a strong suspicion that, overall, the longer version is a richer and better experience for its length. In addition to the contrast this creates between the tension of waiting and the release of action, the extra time aids in the development of character, and this film is a superb example of real humanity in a war film. It's such a marked contrast to the vast majority of war films, which tend to  disappoint with their lack of believable humanity. [3] We'll return to this theme when we consider the characters and actors.




Das Boot begins with shore leave frolics for the Second Watch Officer,
played by the almost always grinning Martin Semmelrogge.


Werner is not quite as into the spirit of proceedings at the cathouse.

The story starts, in this long version, with Werner arriving in a staff car with the Captain. They run a gauntlet of drunken seamen before arriving at what appears to be a cabaret/brothel, where inebriated German U-boat crews are carousing, some having just returned from patrol, others - our protagonists - about to embark. Excitement builds as they get ready to depart. Once underway this soon gives way to boredom and ennui, as a relentless routine takes over. But eventually the actions starts. When it does it really is something to behold, building towards a grindingly intense and prolonged climax, amongst the best moments of war on film I've ever witnessed.


Alrhough I'd quite like to recite numerous scenarios from this superb film, I won't go any further than the above very sketchy outline, which mostly concerns how the film begins, and then very generally how it develops. I've very deliberately attempted to keep this post/review free from too many significant spoilers, so you can hopefully read and enjoy it either as someone who knows the film well or someone for whom that exquisite pleasure lies 'dead ahead'. So, aside from any potential cryptic references I may have made, I've avoided rebelling the major dramatic events, and I certainly won't discuss the ending!



Fregattenkapitän Heinrich Lehmann-Willenbrock.

Prochnow as 'Der Alte'.

One of Buchheim's sketches of a U-Boat pen.

A scene filmed on location at the La Rochelle
U-Boat pens, on the French Atlantic coast.


It might well be observed that the submarine itself is near enough a character in this film. Indeed, one of the chief engineers appears to be morbidly in love with it! Or rather certain parts of it. But I'll deal with the flesh and blood characters before getting to the U-boat herself. Many of the characters, especially amongst the officers, are known by rank rather than name: there's a core cadre of the chief officers, headed up by the grizzled, thoughtful and very sympathetic Jürgen Prochnow (right), as 'der alte' Kapitän. Old on a sub full of late-teenage crew-members means in his 30s! A mixture of manly qualities, with taciturn and stoic featuring quite high on the list, he has real presence and charisma, being very believable as an inspirational leader.



Next in the chain of command are two very different characters: Klaus Wenneman is the Chief Engineer, whilst Hubertus Bengsch plays First Officer, or 'No. 1'. Wenneman's character is the closest in age and temperament to that of Prochnow's Kapitän, albeit a little more overtly melancholy, whereas Bengsch's character, the guy who actually is second in command, is a very clean-cut youngster, rather subtly portrayed as what one assumes to be a by-the-book German officer type. The subtlety of the portrayal lies in the fact that whilst he's very clearly a patriot, it's not made clear if he's an ardent Nazi. This last and potentially tricky theme is handled very well, and very humanely. One can see that for the majority on the boat they are simply men caught up in strange and extreme events simply doing their 'job' as best they can.



Wenneman, to Der Alte's right, in his pre-beard phase.

Pale and bearded upon returning.


No. 1, always makes sure to be clean-shaven.


Wolfgang Peterson's own Das Boot website sums this up well: 'THE BOAT is a film about war, about men at war. THE BOAT is the story of young men, practically boys, hungry for adventure, seduced by Nazi propaganda, enticed by the marvels of technology. Eagerly, they set out to challenge the brutal forces of nature, to battle an invisible enemy. Many are inexperienced. They have yet to learn of the horrors of war; they know neither the loneliness nor the desperation. In the hell of submarine warfare, the alternatives are grim: you either emerge unscathed or you perish. Beneath the sea, there are no wounded.'




Lothar-Günther Buchheim, as a war correspondent,

on board U-96, 1941.


Herbert Grönemeyer as 'Leutnant', Buchheim's counterpart,
in Das Boot.

Herbert Grönemeyer - now Germany's most successful pop star! - plays Leutnant Werner (left). The story as a whole is based on the aforementioned novel his real-life counterpart Buchheim wrote, and in the film it's his diary entries we see, and very occasionally his thoughts form a commentary. Despite his very central role, I wouldn't quite say that the film is entirely told from his viewpoint. But he plays his part, as do all the cast, terrifically well. Completing the ensemble we frequently see in the cramped officer's quarters - basically a table and some seats in the corridor! - is the ever-grinning 1st Leutnant/Second Watch Officer, played by Martin Semmelrogge.



Frenssen, Pilgrim's companion in crude humour,
and an aggressive occasionally bullying character.

Jan Fedder, at right, always amusing and
disgusting with his foul mouth.


There are numerous other roles, such as the filthy duo of Pilgrim and Frenssen (Jan Fedder and Ralf Richter) who delight in dirty anecdotes, the radio-operator/medic Hinrich (Heinz Hoenig), another rather taciturn and stoic heroic type, and the spookily intense Chief Mechanic Johann, 'The Ghost'. There are many more memorable characters, including, amongst the barely out of their boyhood teens, a lovelorn lad with a pregnant French girlfriend and a quiet Bible reading boy. The acting is absolutely superb. It's not surprising that Spielberg, who cites Das Boot as an influence, cast a good number of these guys in Schindler's List.
Erwin Leder, 'The Ghost' in the machine.


Radio and sonar op, medic and crab-killer, Hinrich.
Der Alter depends heavily upon his expertise.


Like most things in life, despite the film itself as presented here being a magnificent achievement, the complete DVD package isn't perfect. The special effects and the music date the production somewhat. But it's actually extremely good, nevertheless, and perhaps especially when you recall it came out in 1981. The soundtrack music - there are numerous instances of in-context music, from the jazzy band at the cathouse to radio and records played on the sub - sounds rather Germanic, and also very '80s (synthesised rather than orchestral). [4]


Regarding the rest of the soundtrack, the dialogue is all dubbed - even the original German had to be dubbed, owing to the noises made on set, in part by the gyroscopic cameras (specially developed for the film) - but as I prefer to watch it in German with subtitles anyway, this isn't an issue to me. The rest of the aural soundscape deserves some attention in its own right, as it's fabulous.






The sound world of a U-boat is meticulously recreated, and ranges from eerie silences with only the creaking of the boat, due to water-pressure, via whispers when trying to evade detection, to the full on cacophony of battle and 'action-stations'. Some of the sounds, enemy boats passing overhead or their echo-location pulses, the sounds of torpedoed shipping breaking up, or bulkhead bolts popping like champagne corks (most definitely not the sound of celebrations!) are terrifyingly evocative.

Listening with baited breath...

Something doesn't sound good...

Whilst on the subject of meticulous reproduction, the boat itself has to be mentioned. I don't know all the technical stuff, but I'm sure there's a lot about it out there on't interweb. It looks as if several different sized models were used [5], and the interiors are in particular worthy of mention. [6] Along with the ground-breaking camera work, these interiors really vividly bring to life the unbelievably cramped conditions submariners had to contend with. Fortunately we don't yet have 'smell-ovision', but the visual production is so damn funky - in the old non-musical sense of that word, that you can almost smell the rank stench of oil, sweat and fear!

U-boats, like Hobbit holes, have round doors.

But they smell more like troll caves.



The only disappointment for me has to do with the DVD package as a whole, rather than the film itself, and it's the 'making of' feature-ette (actually a piece about the director's cut). A little reading online quickly reveals many fascinating stories connected to Das Boot: from the real-life fates of some of the characters portrayed (Capt. Lehmann-Willenbrock's fate differs rather markedly from that of Prochnow's character, and real-life war correspondent Buchheim went on to become an art collector specialising in Expressionist art, a style Nazis had labelled as 'degenerate'), to aspects of the production - actor Jan Fedder, who plays the macho foul-mouthed officer 'Pilgrim', was genuinely accidentally swept of the bridge during filming of a storm scene.


They all got very wet making Das Boot.

The call of 'man overboard' and the scene of his rescue was, apparently, not scripted. Fedder was hospitalised as a result, but Peterson incorporated the scene into the film, even utilising it's consequences, by rewriting Fedder's part so as to have him wounded and bed-bound. The making of documentary could have been both long and full of fascinating stories. Sadly it is neither, and instead, despite its brevity, is padded with self-congratulatory reflections from cast and crew; understandable perhaps, because the film/mini-series is a masterpiece, but not very interesting and, apart from technical stuff about how they did it, not even very edifying.

But I don't want to end on that rather critical and negative note, when writing about a masterpiece that is certainly amongst the best war films I've ever seen, and is frequently cited as amongst the best of its kind ever made. Let's wind up instead with a celebration of what's best about it: well, it's beautifully filmed and superbly acted; the structure of the plot and the development of character throughout the lengthy near five-hour opus are both masterfully managed.

The 'Ghost', happy in his beloved engine room.

Later on it's make or break time... not so happy now.

You will be drawn in by the humanity of these men, despite the butchery that is their their trade, and despite the appalling ideology they were being employed to further. Despite the limitations of the technology available at that time - I for one love inventive 'old school' films of this ilk, with no discernible CGI to be seen - Peterson and his crew and actors create a believable world and, pardon the almost unavoidable pun, immerse the viewer deeply and intensely in a stifling, murky subaquatic domain.

Whatever the ethics or philosophy of such complex thorny issues as war may be, you will be both horrified and yet also inspired by both (red pun alert!) the depths and the heights that humanity  attains in war. In the parlance of the '60s, this is a real 'trip'; watching it is cathartic in the way the Ancient Greeks meant tragic drama to be. Five hours lying prone on the sofa never felt so exciting, arduous, involving or compelling. Verdammt! as Prochnow's Kapitän likes to says, this is one helluva story!

----------

NOTES: Another format that the original Das Boot book has been released in is spoken word, as an audiobook read by Wolf Kahler.

[1] I originally wrote 'paradoxically part...' as if length of time automatically equated to longer = worse! I suppose, ironically, that in most cases, i.e. as far as most movies that get the green light from movie execs go, longer would indeed be worse. But in terms of good films (and probably this is true for good media of any sort, for that matter), duration has no necessary corollary with quality. 

[2] I've not been in the military, but I have been a touring musician, and that life has its parallels: long periods of near inactivity as you travel around, punctuated by short bursts of action. In the military this is characterised as '90% boredom, 10% terror', or words to that effect. Hmmm... have I just admitted that's what my life as a musician was like!? 

[3] Buchheim apparently didn't like this adaptation that much, and thought the acting 'hysterical' and 'clichéd'. As the man whose experiences this is based we have to give him some credence, but I still think that, compared with most war films, the acting in Das Boot is far better and more subtly nuanced. Sure, there's everything from the expected (machismo) to the unexpected (Werner's tearful and trembling soliloquy on facing raw reality), some of which might be considered a little hammy. But wouldn't one expect to find such things in the overall mix in war? And this is a dramatisation.


Arab (1920), by Emil Nolde, part of

[4] I don't know if it is synthesised or orchestral or a mixture. I might look into that? I do know that the actor who plays [Frenssen?] has a brother who's was at this time a member of the experiment art-house industrial noise band Einsturzende Neubauten!


[5] Under the heading 'Sets and models' at the Wikipedia entry for the film it says this: 'Petersen was admittedly obsessive about the structural detail of the U-boat set, remarking that "every screw" in the set was an authentic facsimile of the kind used in a World War II U-boat. In this he was considerably assisted by the numerous photographs Lothar-Günther Buchheim had taken during his own voyage on the historical U-96, some of which had been published in his 1976 book, U-Boot-Krieg ("U-Boat War").' I found a good website that illustrates how this stuff was done here.




Relics from the film are now part of a museum in Bavaria.

Thursday, 7 May 2015

Waterloo 200th - Battlefield meet-up, 19th June?

A view of La Haye Sainte, from the Lion Mound, Sept. 2014. 

Hello

My wife and I have just finished making our arrangements for a short stay in Belgium near Waterloo over the bicentennial period. We - or rather I - left it pretty late, but it's all sorted now... phew!

I noticed, thanks to a post over at TMP, that bloggers had met up at Salute 2015. I was miffed that I hadn't known about that, as I'm new to wargame blogging, having only stared last year, and would love to have met up with fellow bloggers at Salute.

A detail from Louis DuMoulin's superb Lion Mound
panorama painting.

A French cuirassier's cuirass, sword and scabbard; 
can't recall if this was at La Caillou or the Wellington
Museum now; can anyone else put me right?


Fantastic! Or perhaps I should say 'superbe'!?

So, I thought I'd tentatively extend the furry hand of friendship in relation to our Waterloo trip. My vague thoughts at this stage are to perhaps suggest a meeting somewhere the day after the battle, the 19th June, to chat about and compare notes re the 18th. Please contact me here via my blog if this would be of interest, or to let us know if something like this is already being arranged by someone else, so we don't miss out on this as well!

We visited Plancenoit. This is the church there.

I found this plaque on the wall of the above church.

We went to Waterloo and environs last year, as a kind of recce I guess. There is (or was?)* a pub/restaurant at the Lion Mound hamlet, and a café nearby. Mind you, they are neither the greatest of venues. At least the pub is quite large. The café is tiny! Does anyone with better local knowledge have any suggestions as to the best (nicest) potential site for a meet-up? My memory's hazy at this time of the morning, but isn't one of the buildings on the central road a café/restaurant now?

Anyhoo...I'd be interested to hear from anyone else who'll be making the pilgrimage, and I do hope some of us can meet and share our enthusiasm on the battlefield.

Regards

Sebastian

* The whole site's being redeveloped; I'm not sure what changes have been made, other than there being a new larger (underground!?) visitor centre.

UPDATE: Since first posting on this topic I found out, via a thread I'd started at TMP, that the re-enactment events at the Waterloo bicentenary were ticketed. After an initial panic I was able to book tickets - almost all of which had, by then, sold out. I think we probably would've been ok just being in the area at the time. But as I'd been intending to watch the battle it would've been disappointing not to have had access to the battlefield. As it turns out we'll have access to the 'bivouac' area on the evening of the 18th, after which there's an opening ceremony (a rather showbiz looking affair called 'inferno'!), and our tickets include that as well. They also include a 'French attack' re-enactment on the 19th, which I'm very much looking forward to.

PS - I thought I'd jazz up this post with a few pics from our September 2014 visit.

One of several small dioramas in the Waterloo battlefield area.
I forget where we saw this one. Probably at the Wellington
Museum in Waterloo itself. Can anyone confirm?

This is where we stayed (they advertise themselves as 'residence
Brussels South') on our 2014 visit. We would've stayed here
again, only we appear to have left it too late, as all the rooms
were already booked.

Wednesday, 6 May 2015

Book Review - Thunder On The Danube trilogy: John H. Gill



Vol 1 - Abensberg


This first volume sets the tone and pace for the whole trilogy. The tone is serious but relaxed, even refreshingly informal at times, and the pace is perfectly pitched between feeling brisk in terms of excitement and leisurely in terms of Gill taking his time and covering everything. Superb!

Volume one of Gill's trilogy starts with detailed and lengthy but nonetheless very necessary and interesting expositions of the state of things leading up to the war. Summarised as concisely as I can, it boils down to Johann Phillip Stadion egging on the Austrian pro-war faction, using Napoleon's setbacks in Spain as inspiration, against the better judgement of both Archduke Charles, to whom leading the Austrians into war would fall, and The Kaiser. Stadion and the pro-war faction were woefully out of touch with the political and military realities, such that many Austrians felt, in the words of general and rising star Joseph Radetzky, 'the campaign of 1809 was lost before it began'.

Johan Phillip Stadion (source: wikimedia commons).

Once Gill gets stuck into the campaign action you feel he's really in his element - although in fairness to him he does the political preludes just as well - and for many of his readers, lee joss especially is wargamers, this will be where the excitement and interest ratchets up a gear or three. Be warned, Gill's account is very detailed! Almost all 'actions' are covered, and names of commanders, units and places are assiduously given. This is commendably thorough, but might perhaps be a touch too much for the general reader. 

Connected to this is a problem that I feel nearly all military history books (or for that matter history books in general) suffer from, namely inadequate maps. There are plenty of decent maps here, but the number of times - and consequently the waste of time & frustration - I couldn't find a place referred to in the text on any of the maps... Well, it was quite galling, and makes taking the level of interest in detail required by the text a shade redundant at times.

However, this gripe aside, and duly noting that there are more and better maps here than in most books on similar subject matter, the remainder of what's on offer here is great. Having set the scene Gill gets stuck into the manoeuvres and combat, in great detail. Perhaps for some this 'buffish' fixation on detail might be too much, but personally I prefer it to the drier overviews of the sort given in books like Napoleon's Wars, or Clausewitz's almost unreadably stodgy account of the 1812 campaign in Russia.

Still haven't read this companion volume!

But Gill is meeting the needs of the more seriously interested reader, spreading his work over three volumes (four if you includes With Eagles To Glory, his companion piece on France's German allies), and does a great job.[2] One consequence of the level of detail is that, certainly in Volume I at any rate, a sizeable proportion - a good third in this case - of the book is given over to hyper-detailed appendices and notes, including, of vital importance to the wargamers who'll love these books, OOB, or 'orders of battle'.

As well as being almost overwhelmingly thorough, these books are well-written, Gill possessing an amiable tone and quoting diverse sources to good effect, well put together: as well as being beautifully bound and printed, there are the maps, a table explaining rank titles and abbreviations, some good black and white illustrations, and extensive notes. My only complaint on this front is that the index isn't very comprehensive. But best of all, this book - indeed the whole trilogy - is just plain enjoyable.

Personally I'd have preferred the copious notes (there are 120 pages of them!) to have been footnotes at the bottom of each page, a la Gibbons Decline & Fall, rather than gathered as they are at the back. On this, my first reading of the book, I hardly referred to them at all. But its good they're there, as one can return to them as and when one feels ready. There are also sixty pages of appendices (which is where you'll find the OOB etc.), so the detail is, to say the least, copiously comprehensive.

To summarise: vol. I deals with the diplomacy and politics that lead to the outbreak of the 1809 conflict, culminating in Abensberg, the first major battle of the campaign. Stylistically it sets you up nicely for the next two vloumes. I vividly remember how exciting I found reading this. I had planned to ration my reading of the series, but this was so gripping I read it quicker than I'd intended to, and then went out and bought the other two volumes as soon as I'd finished it!




Vol. II - The Fall of Vienna & The Battle of Aspern

Basically a book of two halves, not counting the full third of the book given over, as with Vol. I to very thorough OOBs etc. in the appendices.

The first half picks up post Abensberg, with the bloody fight at Evelsburg a major feature, followed by Napoleon's drive on Vienna and the citys capitulation. Bonaparte, ever desirous of a swift end to a war he hadn't wanted in the first place, then encounters his own misfortune, when his hastily constructed pontoon bridges are damaged. Because of this he fails to deliver adequate reinforcements to his spearhead, leaving himself stranded on the Lobau/Mühlau bridgehead with insufficient troops, culminating in his first serious reversal after years of victories, at the battle of Aspern-Essling. 

A second smaller 'half' then details the events in Northern Italy, as Archduke Johann and Viceroy Eugene come to blows. Again it's reiterated, as on p. 269 that 'Vienna's choice of war under the circumstances prevailing in 1809 was an error of grand-strategic magnitude.' The excellent standard of volume I is maintained, and the level of detail remains obsessively impressive, if at times a little overwhelming. For me the centrepiece of this volume is Gill's brilliant blow-by-blow account of Aspern-Essling, which is really gripping stuff.

As with Vol. I, upon finishing this I was eager to get stuck into the next one!






Vol. III - Wagram & Znaim

As Gill says in the preface to his third volume, his is a traditional campaign narrative and, given that war 'is fundamentally about combat... solid battle narrative is indispensable'. Indeed. Wargamers will be pleased to read this! And fortunately this is also an area in which Gill excels. 

Vol. III starts with action in the peripheral/flanking theatres, some of which, for example the violence and brigandage in the Tyrol, begs further exploration [3]. Gill covers even these 'sideshows' with care and attention, and many great ground level details emerge, showing that when he says 'solid battle narrative is indispensable' he means it. Just one particular example that I really enjoyed was when, in a very minor engagement in the Tyrol, the French/Allied commander, Jean-Baptiste Dominique Rusca had to 'resort to the unusual command and control expedient of dropping his instructions to waiting orderlies in small packets weighted with stones', as he directed his meagre forces from the commanding view of a tower in Klangenfurt!

Equally fascinating as these little details are the pictures Gill paints on the grander scale, such as Napoleon's turning of the isle of Lobau into a veritable military city, complete with defences, logistics (with forges and bakeries as well as lodgings, hospitals and munitions magazines), roads and even street lamps! Having got a bloody nose at Aspern-Essling, attempting his typically impetuous - and in this instance under-prepared - lightning strike, he did things very thoroughly second time around. This included using 'estacades', which were rows of pilings sunk into the Danube, whose purpose was to stop the crossings being wrecked by flotsam and jetsam as had happened prior to and during Aspern Essling. 

And the two largest bridges themselves (Gill includes a black and white illustration of a print after the painting by Jacques Francois Joseph, the original of which can be seen at Apsley House, AKA The Wellington Museum, in London) were so well-built and finished that they were deemed more than just sturdily functional but, painted and hung with lanterns, elegant! Boney's himself effused 'General Count Bertrand has executed works that excite astonishment and inspire admiration.' Comparing the dynamism of the French efforts with the sluggish, pessimistic confusion of the Austrians, one senses that the campaign was already over. Gill articulates this himself perfectly: 'The contrast with his Hapsburg opponents is striking. Where the French built their own boats and bridges, the Austrians complained that none were to be found.'

The chapter on Wagram is superb, balancing fine detail with the bigger picture in exemplary manner. There are so many little details that one could cite, but you'd be better off reading them yourself, rather than me trying to recite them. I will mention the intervention of the weather on numerous occasions, a feature which is so significant it gives the series it's evocative double-entendre title, and is further cited in several chapter sub-headings ('A night out of Macbeth', 'Thunder in Bayreuth', etc.) and, together with the varied landscapes gives great character and vivacity to Gill's narrative.

All in all, an excellent ending to a fantastic trilogy.



NOTES:

[1] Charles Esdaile goes into great detail, but only as regards diplomacy, whilst the vast majority of Clausewitz's account is little more than a list of detailed troops movements which, without good maps, is as good a way to develop a migraine as I know of.

[2] For the interested layman books like Zamoyski's 1812, or Barbero's Waterloo are absolutely perfect, being perfectly balanced, beautifully written, and concise and easy to read. This book has all the qualities mentioned here, except brevity!



[3] After reading this trilogy I ordered Napoleon's Other War, by Michael Broers, which covers this and many other guerilla actions of the Napoleonic period. I reviewed that on the Amazon UK website for anyone interested: Napoleon's Other Wars, Michael Broers. It's an excellent book, but I was a touch disappointed that there wasn't more on the whole Andreas Hofer period, and related Austria 1809 episodes. Gill's accounts are at least as (and perhaps more?) informative on this topic.

Sunday, 3 May 2015

1/72 WWII - Italeri King Tiger



I built the Italeri 1/72 King Tiger over the last day or two. It was a simple and enjoyable build, by and large. The first few pics just show the usual 'what's in the box?' stuff.





You get two sets of tracks, as pictured above: a link-and-length set, and some of the old rubber band jobbies. The only really tricky part of the build was the tracks, as we'll see below.





The rubber band tracks are, as can be seen, oversized. So, I thought I'd do the link and length ones...


Hmmmm!? So, I made a right mess of these, and in addition to that... they're too short!


 So... back to the rubber band tracks.


The two driver type figures are identical, and are fixed to the little bracket type parts you can see pictured above.




I decided to go with just the driver, and leave the other hatch closed. The machine gun is in position. It can be built in movable mode, but I decided to glue it securely. The MG includes inner hull detail of the stock/handle that won't be seen when built.


Building the turret. I opted to use the commander figure. I might want to modify his right arm: the left one sits atop the hatch, the right kind of floats above... nowt.



The completed kit. I've chosen to paint the whole thing post-assembly.




I thought about replacing the rubber-band tracks with the link-and-length ones, as it turns out that with the mudguards in place you can't see the upper part of the tracks, so a gap in them wouldn't really matter.



 I like the above view: the two figures look good, and the vehicle itself has a commanding presence.


At the top is my first model, the Airfix 1/76 Panther, and another early model, a Kettenkrad from a set of WWII light vehicles by Academy. The unfinished Brummbar and the King Tiger being my most recent builds.

This King Tiger was a fun straightforward build. Admittedly the tracks aren't great. There is also a slight anomaly, in that the figures included are not referred to at all in the instructions. Another notable thing is the difficulty of separating some of the parts, e.g. the tow cables, from the sprues without damaging them.

But, all things considered, this was a simple and fun build, and that's got to be good!

UPDATE:

Since first posting this build I did a bit of surgery on the commander's arm, as it was floating in mid-air (see directly below). And then I undercoated in black. So this King Tiger joins the growing ranks o' tanks awaiting the arrival of a decent airbrush.





Friday, 1 May 2015

Book Review: A Near Run Thing - David Howarth



I absolutely loved this book, it was right up there with Barbero's The Battle (also about Waterloo), and works like 1812 by Zamoyski, or Paul Britten Austin's superb 1812 trilogy (both about the disastrous invasion of Russia). In an assessment I'm entirely in agreement with, Napoleonic military book specialists Empire Books [1] describe it in their product listings as 'One of the most admired accounts ever written on the Waterloo campaign.'

Unlike a lot of books about Waterloo, which often cover all sorts of other aspects, such as Napoleon's return from Elba, the battles of Ligny & Quatre Bras, etc, Howarth confines himself to the day itself. I don't doubt that some fussy Napoleonic buffs out there could pick holes in his portrayal of the days events (written in the late 1960s), but as he himself quite rightly says on p.v of his introduction 'too much has been written about the arguments ... too little about the experience'.

Like Paul Britten Austin, whose trilogy on Napoleon's ill-fated Russian expedition is one of my favourite Napoleonic history books, Howarth based this account on the memoirs of the participants themselves, of whom he observes 'Behind all their stilted prose, and underneath their peacock uniforms, they were much the same ...' as we are. Unlike PBA, who uses his sources verbatim, Howarth chooses to reformulate the first hand accounts into his own prose. A job he does extremely well.

Pictured at the top of my post is the older hardback edition I own,
whilst shown above is the current 'Great Battles' series paperback.

Howarth indulges in some speculation, in particular regarding Napoléon's health. He pretty much seems to take the line that Napoleon was very unwell on the day of Waterloo, and that this was in large part responsible for his poor performance. This kind of speculation has become quite unpopular and unfashionable in modern scholarship, but, as he points out at the start of his book, this is not a work of scholarship, but a dramatic retelling of the days events, based on the words of the participants themselves.

The Napoleonic wars were amongst the first, as Howarth himself points out, in which, thanks to increasing levels of literacy, we get accounts from all levels, from generals down to rankers. Using many such contemporary accounts, from the personal narratives of officers and men to Captain Siborne's exhaustive work - 'which I suppose' writes Howarth 'is the most detailed, authoritative and boring account of the battle ever written' - itself based on a massive evidence-collecting correspondence with participants, Howarth's rendering is anything but dull.

When I read this I was glued to the book, for two days solid, reading it in every available spare moment. It's a highly accomplished telling of a tale that's very often been told, but very rarely with such verve. It's always exciting, and often very moving. The 'Night' section (he divides the battle into chronological periods of the day) is terribly poignant and affecting, the story of William Howe De Lancey being deserving of a tragic romance. This is the sort of book that could easily kindle a lifelong love of history.

William Howe De Lancey.

My copy is a 1969 Literary Guild hardback, heavily illustrated. I can't vouch for the 'Great Battles' edition, which is the version most easily available now from seller like Amazon. But if they've left the text as it is in the Literary Guild version then, unlike Napoleon, you can't lose. In a single word: brilliant

----------
NOTES:

[1] I found various listings for this companies books, in $, but I couldn't actually find them under the name Empire Books (that lead to a martial arts publisher!) as a company in their own right on the web. Do they still exist? Are they an Australian or an american outfit?